Sorry, you’re wrong. Bill Barr has spoken out previously. The new winner is former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, who appeared on Sunday talk shows to say that if the indictment allegations are true, Trump should not be trusted with national security info again. I think Esper has been silent till now.
Sorry, you’re wrong. Bill Barr has spoken out previously. The new winner is former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, who appeared on Sunday talk shows to say that if the indictment allegations are true, Trump should not be trusted with national security info again. I think Esper has been silent till now.
From where I sit Barr wins the tiebreaker on account of his more blatant and twisted ability to engage in Bothsideserism with an entirely straight face. But indeed there is stiff competition for all of the awards. As the author and others here have noted, we do not always have the luxury of fighting only with the people we choose. We take support when and where we can get it. But history has a long memory and a deep tradition of giving context where it is needed. I suspect that it will remember Barr primarily as someone who coulda shoulda woulda made a bigger and better difference if he hadn't been so concerned for his own self-interests at the time. And, yes, he is far from alone on that count as well (see: Pence, Mike, among others).
Sorry, you’re wrong. Bill Barr has spoken out previously. The new winner is former Secretary of Defense Mark Esper, who appeared on Sunday talk shows to say that if the indictment allegations are true, Trump should not be trusted with national security info again. I think Esper has been silent till now.
From where I sit Barr wins the tiebreaker on account of his more blatant and twisted ability to engage in Bothsideserism with an entirely straight face. But indeed there is stiff competition for all of the awards. As the author and others here have noted, we do not always have the luxury of fighting only with the people we choose. We take support when and where we can get it. But history has a long memory and a deep tradition of giving context where it is needed. I suspect that it will remember Barr primarily as someone who coulda shoulda woulda made a bigger and better difference if he hadn't been so concerned for his own self-interests at the time. And, yes, he is far from alone on that count as well (see: Pence, Mike, among others).