14 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
mel ladi's avatar

I originally thought that the Tennessee GOP had some there there, and indeed they did, the Dem representatives certainly deserved a letter of reprimand. Being on the correct side of this fight doesn’t make them immune from the body’s rules and decorum. But the TN GOP reps must be drunk on their own power and believe there will be no consequences for that level of overreach. (And yeah, I couldn’t help but notice the two expelled happened to be black.)

There has to be consequences to these types of actions, doesn’t there?

Expand full comment
Beth's avatar

Except that apparently there were no consequences for the representative accused of child sexual molestation (and is heard on a phone call apologizing to one of his victims). None for the one who peed on a Dem's office chair. None for the one convicted of domestic assault.

But sure, there should be consequences for speaking out against child murder.

Expand full comment
Arun's avatar

In legislatures the world over, the usual punishment for violating decorum is censure. Expulsion is usually for getting convicted of a crime or other serious misconduct.

Expand full comment
Terri's avatar

Part of this story is missing. According to a state Senator, who was previously a representative and, is also a black woman, for YEARS this rebublican majority has not ALLOWED debate from the minority party. They cut off their mikes, use rules to jam through legislation without allowing for fact finding sub committees to do the necessary expert and study process that has been done for decades. They kill minority party bills WITHOUT DEBATE!!!!!!!!!!!

Puts what these Tennessee 3 in a different light in my humble opinion. It put's these condescending republican words in a different light. One of these young black men, during their "trial" yesterday, was lectured about introducing bills to get them passed but what has been going on is the republicans kill them WITH NO DEBATE.

They have been silencing the minority party for years with 'decorum' and 'house rules' as a bludgeon, as way to shut them up.

Also, these republicans didn't follow due process as usually one is referred to an ethics committee and a process is followed to do fact finding and the member is allowed to mount a defense. These two young black men did NOT get a chance to get a rigorous defense. It's disgusting and typical of the KKK south. Object lesson in critical race theory for ALL TO SEE.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 7, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
my name's avatar

Especially as the third rep herself pointed out she, a 60 year old white woman, didn’t get expelled for the same offense during the same vote. The forced birth GQP only expelled the young black men.

Expand full comment
Lewis Grotelueschen's avatar

We must remember the protests came in the wake of the murder of six people, including three nine-year-olds. When passions are running so high, it's obscene to inflict such a severe punishment. There may be no direct consequences for the representatives who did this, but the story is terrible nationally for the Republican Party. So there may be consequences for these representatives in the larger sense that the goals of the Republican Party may be thwarted.

Expand full comment
suzc's avatar

I actually had been thinking of a trip to Nashville for a couple of reasons.

I will not go anywhere near TN now, nor FL, nor TX for that matter. I just do not want to subject myself to the horror that is Republicanland lawlessness and disorder.

Expand full comment
Keith Sherman's avatar

From your lips . . .

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 7, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Sheaster's avatar

Oof, easy there, Hoss- I felt all Gateway for a minute.

Expand full comment
Walternate's avatar

Addressing people in this manner is not the most effective way to win hearts and minds.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Apr 7, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
Walternate's avatar

It's not that I thought that was your goal (in fact, reading many more of your comments has convinced me that it's not), but I aspire to give the benefit of the doubt.

The way I see it, if one *truly* cares about an idea, one would seek to change hearts and minds in support of one's idea. To not do so, to me, suggests such a person either: (1) doesn't really care what people think, and just wants their desired outcome, which ultimately is inflicted through force (sounds kinda "repugniKKKlan", doesn't it?), or (2) doesn't *truly* care about the idea about which so much noise is being made; the noise is the point.

I won't declare which of these you are coming across as, nor will I not address how I disagree with your manner of conveyance; after all, "Ppl need 2 come 2 the right judgment on their own. I dont want 2 placate them."

Expand full comment
ErrorError