"Sluts at the club" is always, always, always the go-to argument on abortion, from bottom-feeders like Loesch to slick operatives like Scott Jennings. It's forking infuriating and I really wish that Democrats would start getting in their faces about it.
Yes, it's just the stupid, silly "sluts at the club", "broads", and "skanks" getting …
"Sluts at the club" is always, always, always the go-to argument on abortion, from bottom-feeders like Loesch to slick operatives like Scott Jennings. It's forking infuriating and I really wish that Democrats would start getting in their faces about it.
Yes, it's just the stupid, silly "sluts at the club", "broads", and "skanks" getting abortions all willy-nilly. That's why there have to be restrictions!! To keep them from getting drunk and coked up and forgetting to have that abortion until they're seven months along -- going to get their "abortion on demand" because whoopsie! -- and then heading out to the club again to have more promiscuous sex and have MOAR ABORTIONS!
Because yes, that's how it happens. And it's how fundamentally unserious all women are.
Oh, and late term abortions, it's always because some stupid floozy forgot to get her abortion, not a wanted pregnancy that is going horribly wrong. We don't see monstrous births anymore for a reason.
Before I left Twitter, I tangled with a few "If a woman don't want to get pregnant she should keep her legs shut" philosphers.
I asked them "if a woman wants to have a male partner in her life, can she keep her legs shut?" Any men under 50 care to comment on how long you stay in a relationship with no sex?
That’s a great point. Most men will either expect sex as part of a committed relationship or - if he’s a religious conservative - will expect you to marry him after six months so that he can have Godly sex with you. Thus for most women, having pre-marital sex or marrying after six months are the only realistic relationship options. Put another way, the only way the “keep your legs closed” thing can realistically work is if you’re a religious conservative in a relationship with a religious conservative and there’s a mutual agreement that there’ll be no sex until you’re married. So what “keep your legs closed” is truly saying, in effect, is that *you need to be a religious conservative* who only gets involved with other religious conservatives, and if you’re not then you deserve to suffer for that choice because you’re a sinning slut.
So, when I got busted down from corporal and was made to share my final barracks room with a young boot who I hated a lot, I decided to make it a pet project of mine to try to bang the girl he was trying to get with at the time. We did end up hooking up, but she ended up being one of those hyper-Christian "waiting for marriage before sex" types. Yea, that lasted about one night and I never replied to her texts again (and she sent manyyyy).
I'm not even sure why I chose an age, other than to express I am aware that there are likely some older men who would be ok with no sex in their relationship/
Society as a whole loves to give out dick moves on the basis of indifference in pursuit of pleasure-chasing, I might as well have gotten her used to it at an early age. I certainly had to get used to it young on my end. Things haven't changed much since 2007. If anything, the degree of societal indifference in pursuit of pleasure-chasing has gotten worse with time.
How do we turn this into a bumper sticker? Sluts don't kill babies, babies kill....oh, nevermind. I've had these arguments with Trumpalommpas for years. Its not Trump or politics breaking up friendships and family. Its their hypocrisy. Why are you even voting? You never so much as opened a history book nor have even read a single thought pattern of a single constitutional inventor. You use Trumpsism to give yourself something to fight about. Logic is not the point, fighting is the point. So your biker garbed ass can get on a campaign add and talk about Gretchen Whitmer and "those poor children not going to school for 2 years". Take one look at that biker broad. Does she look like she ever gave 2 shits about school? Hypocrisy.
Yet when it was "those poor children" not getting school lunches, or proper medical care, or decent schools in the first place, not to mention the ones now missing one or both parents because somebody red-pilled them on Bill Gates' nanobots ...
Y'know. Freedom and the Constitution. Or something.
Or ... "Dems are hypocrites - they slam Walker for having multiple kids out of wedlock, and they slam him for taking action to have less kids out of wedlock! Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't!" :(
It's similar to how a monogamous gay marriage is a bigger threat to the institution of marriage than guys who are on their third or fourth trophy wife.
Herschel is black, and we all know about the childlike inclinations and passions that control them. As long as he sticks to black women, who are all probably just welfare queens anyway, and doesn't threaten the purity of our white daughters, no biggie.
Otherwise he's a credit to his race -- a football player, natural to his kind, and he knows his place. We can trust him to be a a good boy who will do what is expected of him and not try to involve himself in complicated matters and questions beyond his proper limits. And above all there is absolutely no danger he'll ever make white America nervous by being smarter than they are, unlike that Obama guy.
Yessir, when it's a Herschel Walker, that's the kind of civil rights Republicans can get behind.
"Sluts at the club" is always, always, always the go-to argument on abortion, from bottom-feeders like Loesch to slick operatives like Scott Jennings. It's forking infuriating and I really wish that Democrats would start getting in their faces about it.
Yes, it's just the stupid, silly "sluts at the club", "broads", and "skanks" getting abortions all willy-nilly. That's why there have to be restrictions!! To keep them from getting drunk and coked up and forgetting to have that abortion until they're seven months along -- going to get their "abortion on demand" because whoopsie! -- and then heading out to the club again to have more promiscuous sex and have MOAR ABORTIONS!
Because yes, that's how it happens. And it's how fundamentally unserious all women are.
Oh, and late term abortions, it's always because some stupid floozy forgot to get her abortion, not a wanted pregnancy that is going horribly wrong. We don't see monstrous births anymore for a reason.
So. Effing. Over. It.
Maybe they forget that broads vote.
Bravo 👏👏👏.
Before I left Twitter, I tangled with a few "If a woman don't want to get pregnant she should keep her legs shut" philosphers.
I asked them "if a woman wants to have a male partner in her life, can she keep her legs shut?" Any men under 50 care to comment on how long you stay in a relationship with no sex?
It’s all over for men at 50?:)
Grin
🥲
That’s a great point. Most men will either expect sex as part of a committed relationship or - if he’s a religious conservative - will expect you to marry him after six months so that he can have Godly sex with you. Thus for most women, having pre-marital sex or marrying after six months are the only realistic relationship options. Put another way, the only way the “keep your legs closed” thing can realistically work is if you’re a religious conservative in a relationship with a religious conservative and there’s a mutual agreement that there’ll be no sex until you’re married. So what “keep your legs closed” is truly saying, in effect, is that *you need to be a religious conservative* who only gets involved with other religious conservatives, and if you’re not then you deserve to suffer for that choice because you’re a sinning slut.
So, when I got busted down from corporal and was made to share my final barracks room with a young boot who I hated a lot, I decided to make it a pet project of mine to try to bang the girl he was trying to get with at the time. We did end up hooking up, but she ended up being one of those hyper-Christian "waiting for marriage before sex" types. Yea, that lasted about one night and I never replied to her texts again (and she sent manyyyy).
There's one data point. I could stay longer than one night, but I'm over 50, so I can't be in the study.
I apologize for the exclusion :)
I'm not even sure why I chose an age, other than to express I am aware that there are likely some older men who would be ok with no sex in their relationship/
I understand the point you are trying to make, but hooking up with someone to annoy your roommate is a d*** move, fortunately for her d***less.
Society as a whole loves to give out dick moves on the basis of indifference in pursuit of pleasure-chasing, I might as well have gotten her used to it at an early age. I certainly had to get used to it young on my end. Things haven't changed much since 2007. If anything, the degree of societal indifference in pursuit of pleasure-chasing has gotten worse with time.
“I might as well have gotten her used to it at an early age …” Whoa, Travis. You sound like a French philosopher. “Life is horrible, my darling.”
How do we turn this into a bumper sticker? Sluts don't kill babies, babies kill....oh, nevermind. I've had these arguments with Trumpalommpas for years. Its not Trump or politics breaking up friendships and family. Its their hypocrisy. Why are you even voting? You never so much as opened a history book nor have even read a single thought pattern of a single constitutional inventor. You use Trumpsism to give yourself something to fight about. Logic is not the point, fighting is the point. So your biker garbed ass can get on a campaign add and talk about Gretchen Whitmer and "those poor children not going to school for 2 years". Take one look at that biker broad. Does she look like she ever gave 2 shits about school? Hypocrisy.
Yet when it was "those poor children" not getting school lunches, or proper medical care, or decent schools in the first place, not to mention the ones now missing one or both parents because somebody red-pilled them on Bill Gates' nanobots ...
Y'know. Freedom and the Constitution. Or something.
"Gram died alone!"
A slut is nothing more than someone who is having more sex than you are, but four kids/four women? That's not a good look my dude.
I'm surprised they haven't gone to the "but look at all the times he *didn't* choose abortion!" defense yet, but I'm sure that's coming.
A slut is a girl raped by a good boy. Slut de jure.
Or ... "Dems are hypocrites - they slam Walker for having multiple kids out of wedlock, and they slam him for taking action to have less kids out of wedlock! Damned if he does, damned if he doesn't!" :(
It's similar to how a monogamous gay marriage is a bigger threat to the institution of marriage than guys who are on their third or fourth trophy wife.
And it gives the men in the equation a pass. So she's a skank but Herschel is, what exactly? It's such a retrograde mindset.
Guys will be guys. They are not really against abortions for their girlfriends. No one cared that Trump converted with porn stars. They're hypocrits.
Hershel is a boy, as in “boys will be boys”, shrug. As trump would say, “it’s just common sense”.
Herschel is black, and we all know about the childlike inclinations and passions that control them. As long as he sticks to black women, who are all probably just welfare queens anyway, and doesn't threaten the purity of our white daughters, no biggie.
Otherwise he's a credit to his race -- a football player, natural to his kind, and he knows his place. We can trust him to be a a good boy who will do what is expected of him and not try to involve himself in complicated matters and questions beyond his proper limits. And above all there is absolutely no danger he'll ever make white America nervous by being smarter than they are, unlike that Obama guy.
Yessir, when it's a Herschel Walker, that's the kind of civil rights Republicans can get behind.
I hereby nominate this for post of the year.