
Trump Brings a Cannon to a Knife Fight
With friends like these, who needs the DoJ?
The winds still arenāt letting up and the fires keep raging across the Los Angeles area. But not to worry, Marjorie Taylor Greene is on the case. āWhy donāt they use geoengineering like cloud seeding to bring rain down on the wildfires in California?ā the Georgia Republican pondered yesterday. āThey know how to do it.ā Happy Monday.
Come Onnnn, Aileen
by William Kristol
Today was supposed to be the day Judge Aileen Cannonās delaying tactics would run out, and Special Counsel Jack Smithās report on Donald Trumpās responsibility for the events of January 6, 2021, would be cleared to see the light of day. On Thursday night, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals denied Trumpās request to enjoin release of the report, leaving Judge Cannonās decision in place for three days. Those three days expired today.
But not so fast! Early this morning, lawyers representing Trump employees Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Olivera in the classified documents caseāabout which the Justice Department has agreed not to release its reportāfiled a motion to further delay the release of the report in the January 6th case. Leave aside that legal experts have pointed out that itās very questionable for Judge Cannon to be accepting any motions and issuing any orders in either of these cases, as they have gone up to the Eleventh Circuit and are no longer properly before her, the official docket of the district court shows the cases as closed.
No matter. Trumpās lawyersāfor thatās what they are, though they nominally represent Trumpās employeesāargued that release of the January 6th report could be prejudicial to their clientsā trial on the classified documents, even though the January 6th report is not about them. The Justice Department denies it would be prejudicial. And in any event, Nautaās and De Oliveraās case is never coming to trial, as Trumpās Justice Department is sure to dismiss it next week.
But the Trump lawyersā motion is now before Judge Cannon, giving her a chance for further delay. The Justice Department will do its best to persuade Cannon not to delay, or will go back to the appeals court to try to overrule her again if necessary. Judge Cannon may yield, or the Eleventh Circuit may have had enough. But Trumpās lawyers might still seek an emergency stay from the Supreme Court. That presumably would be quickly rejected.
Legal muckety-mucks with whom Iāve spoken still think the odds are weāll see Smithās January 6th report this week. But itās not a sure thing.
Youāve got to give Trump world credit. They donāt give up easily, and are shameless in exploiting all nooks and crannies of the legal system to pursue their interests. It does help them that Judge Cannon is colluding in this effort. And I might add: It helps Trump world that, though the legal establishment is withering in its criticism of Judge Cannon in private, itās still mostly polite in public. Sheās a federal judge, after all. Sheās canāt simply say sheās playing politics.
Except she is.
Meanwhile, the Justice Department is going by the book, pretending to take Trumpās lawyersā arguments and Judge Cannonās decisions seriously, and behaving in a way that bends over backwards to be respectful of the judicial system.
A filing yesterday by the Justice Department captures this duality nicely. The Department promises to provide certain additional documents that are actually outside the scope of whatās been requested by the defendants and the court, āin an abundance of caution.ā
āAn abundance of caution.ā That kind of sums it up.
Now of course one wants the Justice Department to proceed respectfully of the system and with an abundance of caution.
But when one side is being cautious and scrupulous, and the other is being disingenuous and unscrupulous, itās a problem. Especially when the unscrupulous side has an unscrupulous Trump-appointed judge helping out.
This is the one-sided fight weāve seen between the legal system and Trumpism. Trump has avoided trial in the federal cases that posed the greatest risk to him. More broadly, heās avoided accountability for the insurrection. Trump has won. The legal system, playing by Marquess of Queensbury rules, has lost.
That expression, by the way, comes from rules issued in 1867 under the name of the Ninth Marquess of Queensberry that replaced the bare-knuckle brawling of the mid-nineteenth century with modern boxing. The rules told fighters that āyou must not fight simply to win; no holds barred is not the way; you must win by the rules.ā
But of course we live in the age of the Ultimate Fighting Championship, not boxing with rules. In Trumpās America, itās no-holds-barred in the pursuit of Trumpism, even while the old guard is still lacing up its gloves. And with Trump nominating and the Republican Senate confirming a couple of hundred Judge Cannons, and with Pam Bondi and Trumpās personal lawyers running the Justice Department, things will get worse.
Obviously, the rule of law in America has never been perfectly fair or consistently applied. We shouldnāt succumb to waves of nostalgia about the legal system of old. Still, on the whole, the rule of law was a real thing. Weāll miss it.
Predicting the Unpredictable
by Andrew Egger
Donald Trump, Sen. James Lankford is pretty sure, isnāt actually going to try to seize Greenland by military force. āThe United States is not going to invade another country,ā the Oklahoma Republican said with a smile Sunday in an interview on Meet the Press yesterday. āThatās not who we are.ā
Rather, Lankford added soothingly, Trumpās bellicose rhetoric toward Greenland was just another one of Trumpās patented maximalist imagine-the-possibilities negotiating techniques. āThe president speaks very boldly on a lot of things. Weāve seen this over how heās done negotiations, whether it be for real estate or how he served as a great president just four years ago. He makes a bold statement, he gets everyone to the table, you sit down and be able to talk it out.ā
Now, I donāt mean to pick on Lankford, who remains the same quiet conservative workhorse heās been since he got to Congress fifteen years ago.1 And of course heās likely correct, too: America seizing Greenland by force remains a remote fever dream.
But I still want to drill down on the pretty remarkable doublethink on display hereāa sort thatās endemic among Republican voters and politicians alike.
Because of course the two statements Lankford is making here are completely incompatible. If it were true that Trumpās wild boasts and threats were only ever negotiating bombast, then they wouldnāt do him much good in a negotiation. His bluff would get called every time.
In reality, Trumpās great strength as a dealmaker comes from the way he takes a sledgehammer to the walls of the possible. Denmark might not want to give him Greenland, but theyāre a lot likelier to engage on the issue if theyāre worried Trump might truly go berserk and try to force them to hand it over by economic coercion or military force.
But in that case Lankfordās reassurances that āthatās not who we areā ring hollow. When has being afraid of transgressing āwho we areā stopped Trump from doing anything? Trump is not a fan of āwho we are.ā To him, āwho we areā is a bunch of losers and goody-two-shoes, too highminded or stupid to throw Americaās power around to get what we want.
Itās perfectly possible Trump will have forgotten his latest push for Greenland within a month. Itās also perfectly possible that heāll zero in on it as a central mission of his presidency. He may see it as a useful distraction from the slow, laborious grind of actual legislation, or solving the war in Ukraine (no longer a Day One guarantee), or lowering the price of groceries (now acknowledged as a bit harder than promised). How do you predict the behavior of a man who both has no interior guiding principles and spurns the constraints of laws, norms, morals, or allegiances?
This erratic unpredictability plays to Trumpās advantage. When thereās no rational way to predict how heāll bounce at any given moment, you can only go two directions: Fret about all the ways things could end in disaster, or assume that things will basically turn out alright.
Republicans like Lankford have lots of practice opting for the latter option. After all, think of all the times Trump didnāt follow through on a crazy pronouncement! Think of how silly the fretters looked then, who worried that he might! But the unthinkable is only unthinkable until Trump actually tries it. Then weāve got to get used to thinking it pretty quick.
Quick Hits
MEETING OF MINDS: Who was that walking out of a chummy sit-down with Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago this weekend? Itās Pennsylvania Democrat John Fetterman!
Fetterman earned the honor of becoming the first sitting Democratic senator to pay a visit to Trumpās court, and Trump sure was appreciative: āIt was a totally fascinating meeting,ā he gushed to the Washington Examiner. āHeās a fascinating man, and his wife is lovely. They were both up, and I couldnāt be more impressed.ā
āHeās not liberal or conservative,ā Trump went on. āHeās just a commonsense person, which is beautiful.ā
Weāve come a long way from the days when Trump accused Fetterman of taking āheroin, cocaine, crystal meth, and ultra lethal fentanyl.ā Thatās politics, baby!
Fetterman, who since the election has quickly developed a Trump-facing persona that boils down to āyou worrywarts all need to chill out,ā spent the days ahead of the meeting preemptively rolling his eyes at expected criticism, joking that he was going to ask Trump to appoint him āpope of Greenlandā and arguing that āI think itās pretty reasonable that if the president would like to have a conversationāor invite someone to have a conversationāto have it. And no one is my gatekeeper.ā
No word on whether Fetterman wore his signature hoodie-and-shorts schlubwear. It would have been against Mar-a-Lagoās dress code, but itās against the Senateās too, which hasnāt stopped him in the past.
MOVING THE GOALPOSTS: Now this will shock you: After Trump spent the campaign cockily predicting he would bring an end to the war in Ukraine in one day if reelected, his team is now quietly admitting it will take significantly longer than that.
āI think theyāre gonna come to a solvable solution in the near term,ā retired Gen. Keith Kellogg, Trumpās appointed envoy for negotiating an end to the conflict, told Fox News yesterday. āWhen I say by the near term, you know, I would like to set a goa.l . . . I would say letās set it at 100 days and move all the way back.ā
Cheap Shots
It was Lankford, recall, who last year managed to negotiate a reasonably tough border-security package that could still get buy-in from President Joe Biden and Senate Democratsāone that fell apart instantly after Donald Trump made it clear to Hill Republicans that he preferred to leave the border crisis unsolved until he got back into office.
Biden himself needs to release the reports, Not Garland. Biden has immunity and he should use it.
Biden needs to pardon the two remaining defendants and order Garland to release both reports immediately. Trump will pardon them on day one and kill the reports forever. Play hardball with him.