439 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

All too sad to be believed. MAGA House members are evidently poorly educated about economics, or don’t give (as A.B. Stoddard would say) a rat’s ass about their constituents’ wellbeing. They should lose their pay for twice as long as a shutdown goes on, then be fired for incompetence or better still sent into exile for attacks on the American people. Their actions will once again cause our international credit rating to be downgraded--at a minimum--and some have opined that a shutdown could lead to a recession. Good luck with that. Maybe they will do so much damage that Trump will stand no chance of re-election.

Expand full comment
Carolynsv's avatar

You got me thinking - why do the Congress men and women still receive pay when the rest of the government employees don't( except for those "critical" jobs that can't be dropped). Do you consider their jobs as "critical" ? They can generally afford to miss pay checks, but maybe they would be less cavalier about shutting the government down if it had a real bearing on them.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Poorly educated, yes. I would stake a small fortune, if I had one, on there being a significant gap in IQ between Democrats and the GOP, from top to bottom. Education can’t fix a lack of curiosity, and a willingness to believe and promote lies.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I think you may find that States with lower property taxes have much weaker schools. I don’t think it is an innate IQ issue.

Expand full comment
Anna Kingry's avatar

This doesn't negate your contention, but many people, including me, have learned many things since school. One huge facet of innate IQ is curiosity.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Well that’s definitely true. And unfortunately it becomes a generational issue. But WHY do they have lower property taxes? Leader IQ versus Leader greed. Probably greed. Still, I’d sure love to have that comparison, but I can’t imagine an ethical way to conduct the study. Maybe by extrapolating from other existing data?

Expand full comment
BlueOntario's avatar

They have lower taxes because they don't like to share, or pay for nice things (most of their nice things came from pork barrel or block grants paid by a wealthier state).

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Agree. And they don’t believe in the common good. I’ve met some who object to requirements for sidewalks in new developments, because it’s a bit too close to communism. Seriously.

Expand full comment
Deutschmeister's avatar

Yet the MAGA House members, as the others, will continue to get paid despite the government shutdown, unlike their non-essential staff and so many others who are deemed lesser entities. Let that soak in. They will get theirs while we do without. The people who are driving the car over the cliff are getting their salary, pension, and benefits to do so, out of our pockets. They do it because they can, and because there are no consequences for them when they are in safe, sometimes gerrymandered districts which ensure no accountability for them other than what the history books later will have to say.

It's a great gig if you can get it, and if you don't care what happens to everyone else. Thankfully momma raised me better than that.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

After Dems have free control of Congress, I wonder if they could be motivated to write legislation requiring future shut downs to apply to their own paychecks?

Expand full comment
howard's avatar

Given how our politics have evolved, a good percentage of congress people can afford not to be paid.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Which makes them look even more like Scrooge. To those paying attention, anyway.

Expand full comment
Deutschmeister's avatar

If they didn't do it before, I'm not optimistic that they would do so later. Sort of like the redistricting issue where I live -- it only becomes a priority when they are out of power and can't do anything about it. Had they acted sooner, we wouldn't be in the mess now. Perceived self-interest likely has a lot to do with it.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

You’re probably right. But I have a fresh sense that Dems are seeing “integrity” as a political weapon, if not a personal virtue. What a concept.

Expand full comment
max skinner's avatar

Can't it be both a virtue and a weapon? I see certain types of politicians flaunting their family values for both purposes.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

The “family values” message of the GOP is similar, if only it was authentic.

Expand full comment
Deutschmeister's avatar

I'm all for playing the integrity and honesty cards. It is the right move in my eyes. If enough people are willing to listen.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Me too; unfortunately I think Dems overshot the integrity goal when they dumped Al Franken. Fortunately he now has a weekly podcast which keeps him in the game. A brilliant and decent person, in my opinion.

Expand full comment
knowltok's avatar

I'm all for it too, the problem is that too many people don't use their brains and so you get Menendez = Trump = They're all corrupt!

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Sep 29, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
JF's avatar

How did I miss this? It looks very recent. Clever, naming it for McCarthy. Maybe it will succeed someday? Thanks for sharing the link, Cranky.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

But THEY are not driving a car over any cliff. That could be dangerous. They know that the car is programmed to drive over the cliff, want that to happen, and hope that the other guy will get the blame as they continue to bank their checks. No money for bread? Let'em eat cake.

Expand full comment
Ycnay's avatar

I was the unwilling participant of 11 government shutdowns, some in the military and some as a civilian. I didn't have a choice and had to go to work and actually DO WORK through all of them, and it was never certain that I would get paid once things started up. If/when the government shuts down, these morons need to show up to work 24/7 until they do their jobs and get government funded and working again. They do not get overtime, they can't work on "pet projects which have no deadlines" (other than being voted out during an election), and they can only have scheduled bathroom breaks and 30 minutes each for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Any shower breaks will come out of their mealtime totals.

These are obviously NOT essential personnel if they have no requirement to show progress on their primary function at this time. Let's see how many of their constituents are contractors and actually open their mouths to push for some sanity and professionalism from their "representatives" when their bills start piling up. Could someone please call the Gazpacho Police to have them arrested for fraud and malfeasance?

Expand full comment
Anna Kingry's avatar

I support going back to the original payment scheme: Delegates came at their own (or their constituents')charges as a service to the country. Nobody knew this part-time job would become a millionaire status gig.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

You got it. Why don’t we worry about malpractice in government? I have friends and relatives who were affected as you were. Nobody was in an income bracket to take the hit. The worry and uncertainty was horrible for them.

Expand full comment
TW Falcon's avatar

Yeah. Something needs to be done about Congress. As MTG says, it's a real peach tree dish.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

Heres and idea.No pay for the House Republicans during the shutdown.They may figure it out then.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I am with you 100%. I don’t understand people who take an oath to uphold the Constitution, and know they are representing other people--not to mention the pay--and then are so vile that they fulfill none of their responsibilities. I wonder if Matt Gaetz is still under investigation for sex-trafficking and breaking the Mann Act?

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment removed
Sep 29, 2023
Comment removed
Expand full comment
BlueOntario's avatar

There used to be a local TV show in my town called Life Without Shame. It was cringy, and foreshadowed a lot of what we have fed to our screens today, but I can't look at a Republican and not think of that title as a fitting title or lede for anything about them.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

When you run on culture wars and that" the government spends too much", actual knowledge of how government works and the ins-and-outs of the economy are not requirements for office.

Expand full comment
Ben Gruder's avatar

Knowledge of how government works is an impediment to this kind of foolishness.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

True. I guess that speaks to the need for Civics lessons in school.

Expand full comment
redlineblue's avatar

"The government should be run like a business!!1!"

Okay. What happens to grazing fees in that scenario?

Expand full comment
mel ladi's avatar

Such a disconnect. Just try getting through to people that the government and business have different funding, methods, goals and shareholders (aka we the people).

Expand full comment
Keith Sherman's avatar

Good luck with that!

Expand full comment
TW Falcon's avatar

So the people who like to say the government should be run like a business first didn't want to pay the bills and now want to shut the whole thing down.

I don't think they understand how business works.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

Or they understand how Trump does business. He was notorious for not wanting to pay his contractors.

Expand full comment
TW Falcon's avatar

And bankruptcy. So I suppose that's next.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

Sure, why not? I wonder what bankruptcy chapter would apply? The one where the entity is wound down and sold off or the one where the entity is reorganized and creditors may or may not get any money?

Expand full comment
JMFK's avatar

The case for Trump running for President in 2016 was that the government should be run like a business and that he was a successful businessman. The NY Civil case has now proven that the only thing Trump was ever successful at was FRAUD. Also, if the US Government were run like a business we would cut our losses by stopping to put more money into the red states than we get back.

Expand full comment
William's avatar

So now the case for Trump is that the US should be run as a fraud, a delusion, a fantasy and this is just what he’s running on.

Expand full comment
max skinner's avatar

Did they need fraud cases to show that. How about the bankrupt casinos? He even built casinos to compete with the ones he already owned. Doesn't sound like a smart business move to me.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

So, Trump has truly made the GOP in his image. They are all fraudsters.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

Also, quite a lot of businesses fail in their first few years.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

Never forget that MAGA is also doing the bidding of their base, which wants the chaos and destruction.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

"Flooding the zone with shit"as steve Bannon once opined.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

It only works because his intended audience has zero critical thinking skills. And it will never cease to amaze that that someone as wealthy as Bannon has no gratitude for living in a country that's allowed him to do as well as he has.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I think “flooding the zone” also works because it is overwhelming our federal law enforcement capabilities. Trump is only now getting called on the carpet for transgressions going back decades. Not much of it is new, but rather the resources are now focused on him. So much grift, so few investigators. Probably applies to many GOP sugar daddies.

Expand full comment
Ben Gruder's avatar

Bannon is a total cynic. He loves chaos and influence.

Expand full comment
Duhrew's avatar

Also makes you wonder what kind of shenanigans he might have been up to when he was a naval officer...

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

I'm guessing that in any other administration, Bannon would not have gotten a security clearance like he did with Trump. The fact that he's still a free man and allowed to do what he's doing stuns me.

Expand full comment
Edward's avatar

I have said this before and will say it again: the MAGA folks--the Steve Bannon, Trump, etc. cadre--are doing work that the Chinese and Russians have long wanted: Destroy the norms of a democratic society and undermine confidence in every democratic institution.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Absolutely. I have studied Russia as the bulk of my life’s work. They are laughing.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

In my opinion, there is a bright through line from Trump asking for emails to this absurd hearing: DNC hack > Pizzagate > QAnon > "the Steal" > "the Biden Crime Family."

The stakes for Putin now are far higher than in 2016.

Expand full comment
max skinner's avatar

The groundwork laid in that time is all he needs. He can sit back and watch it unfold. Except for aid to Ukraine he's got what he wanted.

Expand full comment
TomD's avatar

'Russia, Russia, Russia" doesn't begin to capture it.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

I consider Bannon a domestic enemy of the United States, and should be dealt with as such.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

And yet Bannon walks free. The wheels of Justice are definitely grinding slowly for that one. He might succumb to his cooties before he meets Lady Justice.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I think his time is coming.

Expand full comment
Dave Yell's avatar

He's going to have his "time in the barrel" soon.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

I hope so.

Expand full comment
steve robertshaw's avatar

It's so obvious. I couldn't agree more. Can add Tucker Carlson and Michael Flynn to that list.

Expand full comment
Keith Sherman's avatar

And Rupert Murdoch

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I wonder if all of the base really knows the consequences of their Representatives’ actions. In the moment chaos may sound great until people don’t receive paychecks, child assistance is stopped, workers are furloughed or forced to work for delayed pay (unlike members of Congress). Do they all know what the economic consequences could be globally?

Expand full comment
max skinner's avatar

No. It would take repeated shut downs over years to get that point across. Back when the California budget could only get passed by a 2/3 vote of the legislature, shut downs or furloughs of workers would start in July and continue sometimes for two months. It affects more than just those who worked for the state government directly. Vendors that did business with the state didn't get paid...one governor tried paying with "vouchers" that weren't actually money, but that was a gesture really, nothing that actually helped them. After several years of this, the voters passed a Constitutional amendment to end that supermajority requirement.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

The base will be hurt, and maybe surprised, as they blame Biden. Their representatives will have achieved their chaos goal without a scratch. Maybe next election will have consequences, but unlikely.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Maybe. But even Fox is getting annoyed with the extreme right. They know it isn’t a good look. And some of their hosts are rolling their eyes at the Biden impeachment failure.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Yes, I think the subtle shift in the wind at Fox is part of my own shift in optimism, which actually entered my awareness just yesterday. I’ve been trying to dissect it for authenticity. And I even stated it publicly here, in a very bold move!

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Could you forward your comment or repeat it for me? I’m really interested.

Expand full comment
Micah Grossman's avatar

This is the third or fourth shutdown since the 90s. The most recent was only 4+ years ago. Some people may be able to argue ignorance, but at this point it's just apathy and malice

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

I think I heard yesterday that ALL those shutdowns were via the GOP. Unsurprising.

Expand full comment
Micah Grossman's avatar

Yup, only happens when they have at least one house of Congress. They even shutdown when they have the White House!!

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

They seem a bit confused; every single Director of the FBI has been a Republican. Every single one. And yet the GOP is picking a fight with them as an enemy. I guess they thought their own FBI guys would follow the unofficial playbook and ignore the rule of law for their own kind.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Of course you are right. But not all those who would be affected this time were affected last time. We were also not in the middle of supporting a war. And we did not get a credit downgrade as a result. This Congress will be responsible for two downgrades. That is serious and unprecedented.

Expand full comment
knowltok's avatar

Not following you on the, "We were also not in the middle of supporting a war."

The last three shutdowns were in the middle of US wars.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I stand corrected. We were in Afghanistan last time. That was Biden’s big mistake in my book. I don’t think we should have withdrawn all personnel. And we should never have done it the way we did.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

This time the military is affected; last time they weren’t. I wonder if that detail will erode support for Trumpism/MAGA in the ranks of the military.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I think the military is going to be royally pissed off. Not only will they have no pay I’m sure a lot of them have also heard Trump’s statements about people killed in war being losers, or that McCain, a real hero, was a jerk. And down the line Trump’s remarks about General Milley--someone known widely by the rank and file--should be “hung” (not standard English: a painting is hung, a person is hanged). And what does Trump think would have happened to Europe or even the US without those people in uniform being willing to lay down their lives. Of course he knows no history or geography.

Expand full comment
Ben Gruder's avatar

If people in their opinion silos suggest that cities and racial minorities are suffering more they 'real Americans', they will be absolutely fine with the shut-down. Otherwise, they will blame Obama.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Perhaps they need to be shown what suffering is like for others. MTG’s town drove non-whites out some years ago as I understand it. You can’t understand what you don’t know. Some of the ability to be oblivious is down to MAGA media. DeSantis is helping to amplify those views. I continue to hope someone somewhere will figure out ways to reach those that non-MAGA media doesn’t represent. Not trying was got Germany to find it was led by Nazis. That is simply unacceptable.

Expand full comment
Ben Gruder's avatar

I wish I shared your optimism. But if past history is any guide, the ONLY way conservatives in general and MAGA in particular see a problem as relevant is if it directly affects them or people close to them. It was only when Rs understood that they knew or were related to gay people that they saw gay people as deserving of full status as humans and citizens. They absolutely do not care about the suffering of an outgroup.

Expand full comment
Keith Sherman's avatar

How does this explain their explicit oppression of women> They certainly know a few of them.

Expand full comment
Ben Gruder's avatar

I'd love to know if this is due to MAGA and the right-wing in general placing more of an emphasis on respecting of persons (only people who are like me or who I know personally are reliable witness, and also can be given the benefit of the doubt) over respecting of behaviors. This would also be a root of the emphasis on personal loyalty (which appears to be more prevalent on the right).

Expand full comment
Linda Oliver's avatar

The real base neither knows nor cares. Shut the whole shebang down until their savior gets re-elected, would be their druthers.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Well, it is not like this has not happened before, also because of the Obstructionist wing of what once was the Grand Old Party. Why wouldn't anyone who pays the least bit of attention to what is happening in Washington know that? OK, that lets most of the base off the hook, but some have to be paying attention, don't they? Or do they just get the Readers' Digest version from Fox and Tucker?

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

Surely not everyone is so trapped that they don’t compare media sources. Some of them must hear anti-MAGA viewpoints from friends and relatives. The Trumpies may reject those ideas out of hand, but surely some will be curious.

Expand full comment
Bruce Brittain's avatar

Germany, 1932: Surely it can't happen here. Oh, it's happening here alright. The First Amendment has become America's cup of hemlock as the dis-information industry makes billions from the Dunning-Kruger crowd.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I will happily give you a point by point view of Hitler’s rise and Trump’s rise. You will be shocked. I think I may post about it in my Substack space.

Expand full comment
JF's avatar

Nice to meet you, Alexandra, you “sweet summer child”. But seriously, I used to think the base was penetrable to facts from reliable sources, but no longer. Comparing media sources is definitely not their thing. But it’s a lovely thought.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I try not to be unrealistic. But people did turn away from Trump after Jan. 6. Cassidy Hutchinson explained that she felt really torn about Trumpworld. She knew what was happening ran counter to all her deeply held beliefs, but she was a part of something she had come to feel was central to her life. People actually do leave cults despite being subjected to threats and all manner of emotional distress--but it can be done. Ok--these are outliers, but every vote counts when margins are thin.

Expand full comment
mel ladi's avatar

Oh some of us relatives are vociferous on alternative viewpoints to the Fox/MAGA/Xn TV takes.

Expand full comment
David Court's avatar

Great, but does it have any positive or ameliorative effect? If not, thanks anyway for trying.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

I would make the case that they don't, because if they properly understood the consequences of their votes, they wouldn't elect the likes of Comer and Jordan to begin. And even if it's the worst case scenario and all those services that people depend on grind to a halt, these people would find someone else to blame for it.

To put it another way, while Bulwark-style conservatism still believes in personal responsibility, MAGA believes in scapegoating. That will never change.

Expand full comment
Hortense's avatar

I wonder how many of them think that they are not doing well and that a shutdown will not affect them.

Expand full comment
Alexandra Barcus's avatar

I’m afraid that for many what you say is true. I continue to hope that there are some people who are able to question what is happening. I imagine that most of them will shift the blame. People in cults (Heaven’s Gate, Jim Jones) can’t always see when their lives are threatened.

Expand full comment
Tim Coffey's avatar

I have zero hope for them. The best play is to assume the worst, and move on.

Expand full comment