A.B. Stoddard: All the Ex-President’s Conspirators

It’s important to invest in the best essentials, things like high quality shoes, jackets, cookware. I mean, they make a huge difference in your quality of life,

and your bedding shouldn’t be any different. Should it? So start investing in your best sleep with Bolen Branch who make the only sheets that get softer with every wash, and they feel buttery and breathable on the first night you sleep in them, and they keep getting softer and softer for years to come. Sleep better at night with Bolen Branch, she get fifteen percent off your first order when you use promo code, Bulwark, at bolling branch dot com. That’s bolling branch, b o l l.

A n d branch dot com promo code, Bulwark. Exclusions applies, see site for details. Welcome to the Bulwark podcast. I’m Charlie Sykes. It is August fifteenth two thousand twenty three, and I imagine that many of you will remember where you were assuming you hadn’t already gone to bed.

On Monday night, when the Fulton Grand jury dropped forty one charges, against Donald Trump and eighteen of his cronies in Georgia, Donald Trump now faces an additional teen felony counts on top of all the other felony counts that he is he’s facing. I believe the total is now up to ninety one felony counts for Donald Trump, the forty one counts in the George indictment. Twenty two counts were related to forgery or false documents and statements, eight counts, related to soliciting or impersonating public officers, three counts related to influencing witnesses three counts related to election fraud or defrauding the state, three counts related to computer tampering, one count related to racketeering. One count related to perjury. It is a ninety eight page indictment of Donald Trump and his henchmen.

I mean, it’s all there. All the president’s conspirators, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, John Eastman, Jeffrey Bulwark, Kittas Cheesboro, Jenna Ellis, Sydney Powell, and a bunch of others, and their whole plot overturned the election. The phone call where Van demanded the Georgia Terio State Brad Raffensberger fined eleven thousand seven hundred and eighty votes, the fake elector scheme, the cover up tampering with voting machines, the smearing and harassment of election workers, but perhaps the most amazing thing about this particular indictment is the fact that it specifically includes Rico charges that are usually associated with mob bosses. Past. New York Times reports.

Like the federal law in which it is based, the state Rico law, it was originally designed to dismantle organized crime groups. But over the years, it has come to be used to prosecute other crimes from white collar ponzi and embezzlement schemes to public corruption cases. This is, this is what the ninety eight page indictment of Donald Trump says. Defendant Donald look, AB. He’s behaved like a mob boss his whole freaking life.

He finally got the indictment that he deserved.

It’s so true.

I’m sorry. Our guest today, a b studdard associate editor in column is that real clear politics. I mean, the racketeering thing.

Oh, he has looked up to the mob, emulated the mob, and, of course, been, you know, a low rent monster and skirted the law for his entire career started to catch up with him. And what’s so interesting, I went to read about it. And what’s so interesting is that they don’t have to prove in Georgia under the Georgia Rico statute to the jury They just have to prove that the orange man baby is the head of the enterprise. The law doesn’t require that that they take proof that he knew about or or earned the crimes. They just have to prove the existence of an enterprise and a pattern of racket Yep.

Activity. And the enterprise doesn’t have to be purely criminal. So she knows what she’s doing. They’ve prosecuted politicians before on electioneering and and voting crimes. And so she knows that that this is provable And I think it is likely that the other people snared in the Rico, the other eighteen.

I think it makes it more likely that they that they enter guilty pleas and that they

Yeah. I mean, let’s come back to that in a moment. It it is interesting on the very, very first page of this indictment. I think it was probably the first paragraph I read last night. At all times relevant to this count of the indictment, the defendants, as well as others not named as defendants, unlawfully conspired and endeavored to conduct and participate In a criminal enterprise in Fulton County, Georgia, and elsewhere, the use of the term criminal enterprise, could we have our theme music again?

Because I I wanna read this. Because the ninety eight page indictment, just to get us in the mood of all of this. Defendant Donald John Trump lost the United States presidential election held on November third two thousand twenty. One of the states he lost was Georgia. Trump and the other defendants charged in this indictment refused to that Trump lost, and they knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump.

That conspiracy contained common plan and purpose to commit two or more acts of racketeering activity in Fulton County, Georgia, elsewhere in the state of Georgia, and in other states. So the Don has has a problem here. He spent the morning, the evening in the morning, you know, railing against and out of control, very corrupt district attorney. The usual suspects, you know, are coming to his defense. I like Jonathan Chase’s take on this.

Maybe just maybe the reason Trump keeps getting indicted for crimes is not that the criminal justice system is in the grips of a vast liberal conspiracy, but that he is in fact a criminal. Okay. So maybe You mentioned a couple things that that I think are important because, I mean, there’s something surreal about the fact that we’re gonna have the fourth purple walk. Hasn’t gotten old for me. It’s gotten old for you.

I mean, it’s No.

No. But I was thinking I was thinking, first of all, I wanna thank you Charlie Sykes not dumping me as Secret Podcast guest today. I play a lawyer on Google, but other than that, I don’t know what I’m talking about. So it’s really nice of you to let me join you on this on this explosive day, but I was thinking last night when we were waiting and waiting and waiting. I was thinking You know, this is technically the fifth because, apparently, the super sized superscedar that Jack Smith overlaid on the first Mar a lago criminal charges when he did a second Ron DeSantis is technically the fifth, but it is the last And so we really have to savor the flavor of this one.

I don’t think we’re gonna get another one.

I don’t think it is the last. Oh. I think we’re in godfather part four or part five here, but I I think there are more. First of all, what we saw from Jack Smith down in Florida is his willingness to enter superseding indictments. Yeah.

There’s no reason to believe that he will not do the same thing in the January sixth case, not to mention the way that Donald Trump continues to bait the judges in every single jurisdiction to hold him in contempt. I mean, Can we sum up here for a minute here? I mean, Manhattan prosecutor. The Hushmoney case, thirty four counts, the classified document case, Mar a Lago forty counts, thirty four plus forty. The, subversion case, the January six case, four counts, and now another, thirteen counts against, Donald Trump at I think you alluded to this.

Look, this is not just same old same old because the Georgia case is different. I mean, for some pretty major reasons. I mean, first of all, it’s a state charge. So there’s no presidential pardon, which is huge. In the back of my mind, I was thinking, well, what about, you know, a Republican governor of George?

Well, in Georgia, the power to pardon is vested under the state constitution to a board of pardons and paroles, and it requires that a sentence be completed at least five years prior to applying for a pardon. That’s pretty big. Also, it is very likely this trial will be televised. This may be the only case that’s broadcast to the world. Now, Trump might try to remove the case to federal court.

If he does that, it won’t be televised, but that’s a big difference. But you put your finger, I think, on one of the key differences. These Rico cases, this racketeering case is very complex And there are major incentives for these co defendants to flip to seek deals in return for new evidence. So talk to me about that.

So that’s what’s so interesting is that as they were criming with Trump and then in the aftermath, all these years that have passed You know, Cindy Powell, Giuliani, everyone ensnared in this. The other, like, actual fake electors and former party officials and state senator and people who are in this basket of of eighteen people. They’re just facing a a different reality when they wake up to this than they did when they were thinking maybe we’ll beat the wrap and Rudy was drunk texting them at night, telling them it was all gonna go away. And he was an expert on the Rico statute and it would be fine. It’s real now.

And so the idea when she says she plans to cross cute everybody at the same time. She is likely assuming that the number’s gonna go from nineteen down to far fewer than that and that she is going to get to get some cooperation from these people who are facing mandatory minimums of five years in prison and then also they can’t fundraise off of indictments on truth social and pay their legal fees. So their world is different now that it’s real. And it’s likely that that they are gonna cooperate with the state and that brings the number of defendants down. It makes it a clear path for a trial.

And and what she describes is an ambitious calendar. Right? Six months seems a lot for nineteen defendants, but I I we’re assuming she’s thinking that number goes way down. These people turn on Trump. I am wondering this morning, Charlie.

And again, maybe the legal minds out there understand this. What happens when Mark Meadows doesn’t cooperate with Fanny Willis in Georgia, but likely has with Jack Smith in a federal case. So I think there are more surprises like you said to unfold.

Yeah. No. That’s a really interesting question because, you know, Fannie Willis has at least suggested publicly that she’s not coordinating with feds in all of this. That seems I don’t know. There’s a big question mark over that.

How do you not, you know, step on one another? There has to be some sort of coordination. We don’t know for a fact that Mark Meadows cooperated with Jack Smith, but I think that that was kind of the assumption. He was not named as one of the unindicted co conspirators. So we don’t know.

The point we’re talking about though is so important because I think there are some critics who looked at this and said, Okay. Jack Smith narrowcasted his indictments. He went after Donald Trump made it as simple as possible. He could have charged all those other guys but he didn’t because he didn’t want to, throw too much dust up into the air. She has taken it the opposite approach of, you know, going after nineteen people all at once.

She was asked last night. Do you plan to try them all at once? And she said yes. But to your point, She also knows that an actual indictment marvelously focuses the mind. Right?

I mean, prosecutors will tell you that people will say, we’re not cooperating, we’re not cooperating. We won’t take a plea agreement. We won’t take a plea agreement. And then suddenly, when they are faced with an actual indictment and arraignment and arrest, and all of that, and as you point out a mandatory minimum five year sentence that will not be wiped away by a president Trump or a president Vivec or a president Ron DeSantis. You know, they’re gonna have to actually serve those terms.

That’s when you have that really serious come to Jesus moment with your lawyers.

Yeah. And then I think you start to hear that godfather music in your head.

Oh, I’m I’m gonna be hearing that all

But, yeah, I I think it’s just a it’s a whole different ballgame when there’s a mandatory five years in in prison. It just sounds like the Georgia Rico statue is obviously gonna play to the state and that that that it is gonna be very tough for the defendants. And so at this point, if if Trump can’t promise me the pardon, Like he’s giving his pool boys at Mar a Lago in the documents case. It’s a cold reality, and I and I don’t I’m, again, I’m not a lawyer and I don’t know what Bonnie Willis is assuming and and what her strategy is, but I believe that that we’re gonna see some flip and that things are gonna change as we get closer to trial.

Well, that’s the strategy, but also I don’t think it’s possible to overstate the degree to which obstruction of justice by dangling pardons is part of the Trump strategy. It was a huge part of the Mueller report. And the fact is that, Donald Trump’s whole life tells him that, yeah, he he can obstruct justice and get away with it. And and the prospect of pardons certainly has a way of, you know, counteracting any other pressure that the prosecutors could put on, you know, potential witnesses. Well, that’s gone.

That’s wiped away. It’s a completely different environment. So we’ll see. There are other criticisms of of of this, I haven’t look, I wouldn’t we’re not playing lawyers here, and so I’m gonna apologize in advance for all of that. Ruth Marcus, who is certainly no squish on all of this, has some qualms about the breadth of the, the Georgia case and she writes in the Washington Post this morning Where justice department special counsel Jack Smith took pains to acknowledge Trump’s first amendment rights and appeared to craft the charges to avoid butting up against free speech concerns, the Georgia indictment does not tread so gingerly.

The very first overt act It cites in furtherance of the alleged conspiracy is Trump’s speech declaring victory in the early morning hours following election day. Now overt acts don’t have to constitute crimes in and of themselves, but using a candidate’s victory speeches evidence against him is one aggressive move. And this is already kind of a theme that you get from, folks on the right that wait. So she’s actually charging us over acts tweets or statements or things that were said like this. It does sound like she’s going after speech, your thoughts.

I mean, I I know what the counterargument is, but it seems like she’s she’s given a very powerful talking point. I don’t know whether it’s a legally valid point, but it’s certainly a it’s going to be a talking point going to be on fire on, say, Fox News, OA, and NewsMax all day today.

Right. Well, Charlie, the problem at this point at indictment number five, because the superseding one, and then the ones to come, we have a real problem with Americans tuning this stuff out. It becomes too confusing for you and I to even explain. And people, you know, you and I have friends and family members. They might not be admitting into it.

Although some of mine have, that they can’t keep this stuff straight, and they’re not gonna take the time to learn or just learn. They’re, like, it’s, like, too much noise. And so that’s part of it. When you start talking when you look at Donald Junior’s tweet this morning, he goes right at, you know, criminalizing, you know, regular stuff

—

Speech.

—

and speech. And it’s so it’s it’s very easy to confuse. Although the statute makes clear that if you take an Uber you know, and part of your furtherance of of your goal, you know, in the criminal enterprise, taking an Uber is obviously legal. It’s things that you do to create the pattern and to meet your criminal objective. That is gonna be easily explained to a jury.

But yes, in the media, It’s it’s hard to explain.

Once again, let’s remind everybody that every act of fraud involves some sort of speech. Every conspiracy involves words that are spoken and This has been the defense that they’re trying to raise that, will it lie at a first amendment right? Well, you don’t have a first amendment right to commit a crime or use words to intimidate or to, induce somebody to commit a crime. That’s why this racketeering at you. I think is so important.

We’ll see whether or not those specific, things, you know, we’ll be able to survive, you know, legal scrutiny. But Just a reminder about this whole well, it’s just you can’t criminalize speech. You can criminalize speech if the speech is part of a criminal act. And I think this is something that we’re going to be hearing. And I I thought that Judge Chutkin in the other case in DC last week.

This is, like, more than a week ago.

I know. I know. It it works time, all this stuff.

It works a lot of things. But, yes, I mean, she told Trump, you know, you don’t have an absolute first amendment right. You are, you know, you’re out on bail. You have terms of your, you know, conditions and And if you continue with this inflammatory rhetoric, we’re going to speed up the trial. Look, I have to admit that I’m not a sheet guy until I got these sheet And the first time I got into bed with the Bolen Brand sheets, I could feel the quality immediately.

I don’t know what was different. But I realized immediately that they were breathable, silky soft, and they get even better with age. And they’ve helped me sleep better at night The sheets look and feel beautiful. We chose the earth tone, but they come in all kinds of colors, and they feel luxurious every single time you get into bed. Bullen Branch signature hemmed sheets are best seller for a reason because they’re the only sheets that get softer with every wash.

They’re made with the highest quality one hundred percent organic cotton threads on earth. And that’s why they feel buttery to the touch and are super breathable, so they’re perfect for warmer weather. That’s why they’re loved by millions of sleepers and have over eleven thousand rave reviews. Bolen Branch signature sheets. Come in ten versatile colors in all sizes from twin all the way up to California king, and they’re designed to feel incredible for all sleepers.

Because they’re made without toxins. They’re free from synthetic pesticides formaldehyde and other harsh chemicals. The Bolen brand sheets fit the deepest of mattresses, and they’re labeled with top and them tagged. So actually making your bed is easier than ever. And best of all, Bolen Branch offers a thirty night worry free guarantee with free shipping and returns on all US orders.

Sleep better at night with Bolen Branch sheets. Get fifteen percent off your first order when you use promo code Bulwark at Bolen Brand dot com. That’s Bolen Branch, b o l l a n d branch dot com promo code, Bulwark. Exclusions apply. C site for details.

Look, I think it’s important to invest in the best essentials like high quality shoes, jackets, cookware, etcetera. I mean, they make a huge difference in your quality of life. But your bedding shouldn’t be any different. You spend a

lot more time with them. Look, so start investing in your best sleep with Bolen Branch, where they make sheets that get softer with every wash. They feel buttery and breathable on night one, and

they get softer and softer for years to come. They’re made to last with one hundred percent organic cotton. Bolen Branch sheets are an upgrade that you will never regret. You know, I’ve been on the road lately, and it’s been hot. It has been muggy.

And I have to say when I came back, One of the highlights was going back into my bedroom and crawling into bed with the Bolen Branch sheets because even on the hottest days of the year, You can sleep cool and comfortable. This summer, sleep better at night with Bolen Brain Branch sheets. Get fifteen percent off your first order. When you use promo code Bulwark at Bolen Branch dot com. That’s Bolen Branch, b o l l a n d branch dot com promo code Bulwark.

Exclusions apply, see bowen branch dot com for details. Before I forget, I’d I just can’t get past this, that how the Georgia case is different the sheriff down in Fulton County is saying, yeah, I’m gonna treat Donald Trump like any other defendant. We’ll find out whether he does because that will mean that he has a mugshot taken. Yes. Will he be handcuffed?

I doubt that. But the mugshot is gonna be a moment. The mugshot’s gonna be a moment. Because so far, Donald Trump has not been treated like any other defendant in these cases.

No. I completely agree with you. And and the weird sick part is it’ll be a moment that’s bad for him, but he wants it. And so I’m gonna be so interested to see because his fundraising and his pulling bumps have been reduced with each passing indictment. And he really needs the money.

So I mean, really fascinated. He’s gonna have mug track t shirts and all that. I mean, really fascinated. To see, you know, how much of a pop he gets for this. He will get more if he has a mugshot.

But I also wanna quickly back up. There’s something in the indictment that talks about the conspiracy to claim victory in a draft of this speech on October thirty one.

Right.

And he discusses a draft speech with unindicted co conspirator individual one, who I will not confirming this audience, but someone has speculated on Twitter might be Tom Fitness of Judicial Watch, who was as we know from the reporting talking to Donald Trump in June or July of twenty twenty about how he should claim it was rigged Remember, and the mail doesn’t Bulwark, and the fraud, and the mailboxes

Oh, yeah.

Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. So it says that he discussed that five days before the election, and it says that unenjoyed co conspirator individual one whose identity is known to the grand jury that they would falsely declare victory and falsely claim voter fraud.

The speech was an overt act in furtherance of the vera see. So this kind of thing will be very easy for the jury to follow. But as I was texting with a friend this morning about whether his parents who are trumpers would care about this fact, that the plan to pretend that he won was actually you know, hatched days before November fourth, and he, of course, highlighted Charlie that this would not be discussed on Fox News.

I don’t know how how completely hermetically sealed Fox News can be about all of this. Now Owen Ann and News Max, I think, you know, I just don’t know. I mean, at at a certain point, that’s why I televised trial, I think, will be different, makes it different. But we we don’t know. I mean, there there is a I’m wrestling with with two competing instincts here.

Number one is that never bet against the pattern continuing itself. And so when people say, well, is the Republican party gonna break with Donald Trump now? Seriously. I mean, after seven years, you are still asking that question. No.

No. No. They didn’t break with them after the Hush money. They didn’t break with them after the espionage act charge. They didn’t break with them.

After this subversion conspiracy charges, they’re not gonna break with him now versus the but wait. Maybe some things do act actually matter. Maybe there is some moment of sobriety. And maybe for the Republican party, it will come too late. I mean, this is the thing that if that If you’re a Republican candidate or operative, you have to be thinking, look at that calendar.

You could have the worst stuff dropping after Donald Trump has already secured the nomination, after it’s all over, after you are completely lashed

to in which case you are all in on Donald Trump. Right? I mean, the one complaint that Trump

made, Mark, this, that I think was I actually had a little sympathy with him on. Believe it or not. Said, why did this take two and a half years if these crimes took place? Why did they wait so long and drop in the middle of a campaign? Now, obviously, he’s making a bad faith argument.

But I have expressed my frustration at how long it has taken. I mean, this has taken a long time. And as a result, The calendar is a freaking nightmare.

I agree with you. I think that point that he made is resonant. I think that it will help him I think we all wondered why Georgia was was taking us along. But in terms of your other point, I don’t know that it changes the mind of the voters and the perspective of the base and the direction of the primary. But in terms of the timing, it is interesting how close it is to the first debate.

And I wrote last week, and then we’ll work about how some of the candidates have abandoned the big lie. They have the chance of the debate. The rest of the field to literally put it to that as a group. We have Pence. We have Christie.

We have Ron DeSantis, and then Tim Scott’s on the record saying that Biden won the election. Remember he he voted to certify. Biden’s election on January sixth or seventh. So it is interesting. If you think about something like that bid I just read from the indictment, maybe people who are thinking that the end is near for their candidacy, and they’re willing to say on the debate today that Donald Trump lost the election, why not read that part of the indictment and say there was a freaking speech drafted five days before on Halloween before election day And this was, you know, this is a an overt act in the in furtherance of the conspiracy cited the indictment.

Why it was zero drafted speech saying that he won the election despite the fact that everyone else thinks he lost. Like, I mean, would they go that far? And and of course, so so I don’t believe that voters will

vote, but

I’m wondering about the candidates like DeSantis who see you know, does he do the protracted sort of march to certain death, or does he end his candidacy like JBL thinks sooner? And if he’s trying to preserve his dignity, does he go that far on the debate stage?

The base is not going to budge. I mean, people with the Maga hats are not going to budge and quite frankly, and I’m gonna be misinterpreted here probably. But, and, you know, I’m tired of listening to them and talking to them about all of this because they are not the my majority I mean, I I think that at a certain point, we ought to recognize that base is maybe thirty percent of the electorate and the vast majority of other Americans are looking at this and going, this is crazy. And the the voters will determine the outcome of the election. I think, you know, might pay attention to this and might be influenced.

So, we’ve gotten into this doom loop of talking to the same people over and over and over again. I think it’s time to get out of the diners in Western Pennsylvania and notice that, look, there are a lot of other Americans tens of millions of Americans who are thinking this is disqualifying, but I wanna go back to your piece about the debate, which is in my hometown next week.

Yes.

And I think it’s suddenly become much more interesting. Well, I it’s been growing on me. I’m generally not a fan of debates. But you point out that the moderators, Brett bear and Martha McCallum, are almost certain to ask the candidates whether they believe, you know, he lost the twenty twenty election. What I thought was interesting, you you wrote in the Bulwark about this June interview that, Brett Bear did with Trump back in June, and, of course, you know, Trump is lying.

And and bear put is back, you know, talking about all the recounts, that that found no significant widespread fraud. And bear said there were lawsuits, more than fifty of them, more than sixty, I think. Your own lawyers, some in front of judges, you appoint. They came up with no evidence. And he wrote that Trump just responded to bear with what you wrote as, quote, his drool string of random nouns and phrases.

He has used to titillate his voters for coming on now for three years, truth to vote. And stuff ballots and fifty one intelligence agents and all of that stuff. And bear with blood. Is it you lost the twenty twenty election? So This is gonna be a big thing at the debate.

So, okay, Chris Christie is gonna tell the truth. Right? Yeah. Okay. He’s on this stage.

The other candidates have all acknowledged at one point or another, but when they’re on Fox News in a Republican debate, What is Tim Stott gonna say? What is Nikki Haley gonna say? What is Vivic gonna say? What what is Rosanda gonna say? How do you think they’re gonna handle it?

So this is why I’m actually not hopeful, not a mistake, but excited about the debate. That’s the word that I’ve landed on. And that’s because given the recent comments from Ron DeSantis, about the fact that Trump lost and those theories were unfounded. The fact that he has officially abandoned the big lie after all these years Given the fact that Tim Scott did vote to certify Joe Biden’s election, given the fact that Chris Christie is gonna be there pounding away at the truth. Mike Pence will say that Trump lost and Biden won.

And the fact that the moderator is going to be coming at these candidates the same way that he did a month ago in an interview with Donald Trump is going to make it hard on people like Tim Scott, who I expect to squirm. I think he’s running for vice president.

There’ll be a lot of squirming. Yeah.

Of course, Vivek, who says January six is a result of censorship. Will do his BS, but I think that we don’t really know. What it’s gonna be like to be pushed by Brad Bear. And then, you know, who’s gonna be backed up by Chris Christie Mike Pence and DeSantis for Nikki Haley, to try to squirm her way out of it. I think it gonna be really interesting.

I think it Will Saletan. And and also, you know, for somebody like Iran to Sande I mean, this really is, kind of a make or break moment. I mean, if he’s going to be the alternative, I see that he’s actually slipping behind Chris Christie in New Hampshire. I mean, they’re both in single digits. But either he has a breakthrough or people realize, yeah.

He’s not the guy. But I I you know, in the back of my mind, I’m gonna be thinking, you know, this debate takes place the week after the fourth indictment. It will be within a day or two of Donald Trump’s Perp walk and mug shop. And the candidates at some point have to be thinking. Okay.

Do I actually want to beat Donald Trump? Do I wanna win the nomination? Do I wanna be vice president? And if I wanna beat Donald Trump, how is it that a guy who has been found liable by a federal jury for rape facing fraud charges, conspiracy charges, violating the espionage act, all of these things has been accused, you know, of racketeering. How come I can’t be him?

How is it that I cannot convince voters that maybe this is not a good idea? To go into twenty twenty four with all of that. I mean, it’s one thing to say, you know, he’s a dominant political figure, but you would think that somebody would figure out that if you wanna beat Donald Trump, you have to beat Donald Trump, or are they still, AB? Waiting for the magical unicorn? I think they’ve been waiting for the magical unicorn.

The magical unicorn came in Fulton last night, but I don’t know. It’s not gonna be enough, is it?

I agree with you. So I agree that they’re all hoping that he dies or has a stroke, or an otherwise catastrophic health event. That’s always been their plan. And that they will be perfectly in line for the Magabase to turn to in their sorrow and panic and, you know, nominate And that’s obviously crazy. What I think is interesting is at this point, I think Vivec is running for a cabinet position, and I think that Healey and Tim Scott are running for VP.

And so for the rest of them, it’s really I mean, for Ron DeSantis who sees himself losing market share with each passing month. He’s only been in since May, but he’s lost twenty five points since February. In the average pulling. And he’s heading in one direction. I think Ron DeSantis is a smart enough man, and so is Mike Pence, and Chris Christie is on sort of a different mission, but to realize that the Magabase is unpersuadable.

This is a cult. And they are not going to be persuaded. If they thought six months ago, maybe we’ll get in, we’ll shake it up. Maybe Maga panics about the fact that Trump can’t win. They turn to a sensible alternative.

Rhonda Sanchez knows now that that’s not gonna happen. And so at this time, Are you trying to to run against Trump? Are you trying to lead these voters? Or do you just want a dignified n? And if you want a dignified n, you tell the truth?

I guess. I continue to be amazed even after seven years that more people don’t want the dignified route as opposed to the, is this really worth it?

Are you currently enjoying the show on the Stitcher app? Then you need to know Stitcher is going way on August twenty ninth. Yep. Going away as in Kaput, gone dead. Rest in peace Stitcher,

and thanks for fifteen years of service to the podcast community. So switch to another podcast app and follow this show there. Apple, Spotify, or wherever you listen.

Introducing Rich Valdez, America at night. Secret Podcast.

Welcome to the conversation, Familla.

A perfect blend of news and entertainment, interviews and in sites.

It’s really just an expose on how messed up things are.

America’s nighttime town hall whenever you want.

It’s a huge problem that deserves a lot more attention.

Rich Valdez, America at night. Follow the podcast. Wherever you listen.

Okay. Before I get to my next question, I I have to read something from CNN Stephen Collinson. I share his sentiment here. He writes, the most astonishing aspect of former president Trump’s fourth criminal indictment is not the scale of an alleged multilayer conspiracy to steal George’s electoral votes in twenty twenty from their rightful winner. It is that the most astonishing aspect.

It is that Trump. The accused kingpin of the scheme to overturn Joe Biden’s victory, who was charged on Monday along with eighteen others could, in seventeen months, be raising his right hand as the forty seventh president of the United States and swearing to preserve, protect, defend the constitution, he is accused of plotting to shred. I mean, this is this moment. So you look at the Republican party and you go, really, I I know you’re sort of caught up in the rally around, but they’ll This is not rational behavior. It’s not rational behavior from a political point of view.

And if you just take two steps back, It is really bad for the country. I mean, it is it is really as if you are wishing and rooting for a constitutional crack up. I wouldn’t be on crisis to a constitutional crack up.

I don’t often quote Van Jones but I thought that he also, had one of those moments this morning describing it on CNN, where he said You know, the truth is, like, yes, you’re innocent till proven guilty, but if someone came to you to apply for a job at your vape shop, Charlie. I mean, Van Jones didn’t use that example. It’s

a good example.

It was facing ninety one criminal charges, like next. Yes. I mean, and you’re asking gonna you’re gonna vote for this man to be president of the United States. I mean, he’s facing ninety one criminals. So, like, it it’s it’s so beyond real and irrational that we we can’t find the words for it anymore.

Look, I’ve I’ve made this point before, so I apologize for repeating myself, but it bears repeating. We have reserved our lowest possible standards for the presidency of the United States because to your point about the vape shop, okay, it is inconceivable that any publicly traded company in America would name or consider a Donald Trump as a candidate for a CEO facing all of these indictments. It is inconceivable that any university, any school, any college, any team. I mean, what what organization in the world would Think of hiring someone for, you know, the top job. If they face ninety one criminal counts, if you went in to be the manager of a used car dealership.

And someone did a background check on you and found that you were facing ninety one felony charges, you would not be hired. You would not be hired at the vape shop. What job could you get of responsibility in any sector of American life? I’m thinking about this. I’m just thinking about anybody in the military would he there’d be any chance that he would pass any security background check at this point.

And yet, we might elect him president of the United States again.

You know, other non dog lovers say I wouldn’t hire him to walk up my dog, but you and I, obviously, that’s unthinkable.

Absolutely. You wouldn’t be

a candidate. But, no, it’s true, and it’s really depressing. And What’s so interesting about these voters that we keep, as you say, like, you know, we can’t unhinge ourselves from their opinions the Magabase. I mean, with each passing indictment, they continue to believe that the deep state has continued to make up more evidence. Like, that’s what I love.

Like, If it was just one or two, they could be like, this is crazy. Like, you know, something’s just I don’t know. You know, they came up with, like, they’re they’re giving him a bomb rat, but there was There was a quote yesterday that I absolutely have to find. It was a New York Times piece about with the fact that each indictment continues to help Trump and the well, with the indictment effect. And Mallory Butler, she’s thirty nine from Polk County, Florida, Charlie Sykes she says Ron DeSantis doesn’t have a pack of dogs hunting him down.

And that tells me that somebody’s probably backing him, or he’s in somebody’s pocket at this point, and Trump doesn’t have that, she said.

Every single

piece of evidence in every page of all these indictments of ninety one criminal Charlie Sykes federal judge telling us that a jury has found him guilty of rape. All of this data is all of it’s made up, and the government just continues to make it up. In their view.

You wrote last week in in the bulwark, you know, accepting the big lie comes with downstream consequences and it is forever. It means that Trump has never lost an election. It means that these candidates believe they are now living in an autocracy. It means that every criminal charge, Trump faces is fraudulent. And it means those men and women are not actually running against trump to defeat him, but to help him and his party going forward.

So, you know, that’s you’re talking about the the other candidates, but that’s where we are. Speaking of of them. What’s going on with Mike Pence do you think? You’ve watched Mike Pence for a long time. It’s kind of striking that Mike Pence who has waffled and we need all over the place on all of this in very puzzling ways because I I mean, I’m actually willing to give them a lot more credit political courage in January six that a lot of critics are out there.

But instead of leaning into it, for months and months and months, he seemed to be downplaying it, walking away from it, really minimizing what ought to be his legacy. I mean, the pivot point of his whole life, but now He’s he’s kinda leaning into it. What do you think? What’s going on?

I kinda like it, Charlie Sykes found him so painful to watch and to stomach. But he’s just having a moment. He’s just I don’t know. He’s, like, liberated. I mean, maybe I’m just — Yeah.

— wishcasting. But he seems that way.

No. I think that’s with Tim Miller’s point is that at a certain point, you’re a candidate and you’re like, hey, you know what? I’m not gonna win, you know, and the end it is, you can become you can actually say what you’re thinking, which is kinda be kind of freeing.

You know, he’s he’s so cringe and watching all those times that he sat there in those cabinet meetings, you know, just filleting Donald Trump and everything. It’s all so nauseating, but I found myself washing him in these recent clips where he people start to jeer at him or or, you know, make false accusations. And he calmly takes the time to explain to the audience, like, you know, to give him the truth. And it’s actually just really cool. I don’t know.

I just feel like he know, he definitely has nothing left to lose, clearly. And I think he wants to finish with dignity.

And I think he puts himself back in at least part of the conversation. I was asking you about, you know, what are the various candidates going to say on the debate stage? I left Mike Pence out. Mike Pence is gonna be on that debate stage. And it will be interesting.

I mean, Ron DeSantis wants to look like the next guy in line. I don’t know that he’s gonna be able to pull that off because there’s going to be Mike Pence. And if Mike Pence does on that debate stage what he did in Iowa last week, then I think the people he’s gonna attract a certain amount of attention. So I mean, I personally would not wanna be on the stage with Chris Christie. And if I’m Miranda Sanders, I really have to look over my shoulder at Mike Pence.

Not look, neither the guys is gonna win this nomination. But keep in mind that when they do back to your point about what will they say about the big lie, Chris Christie and Mike Pence, and the others who, you know, denounced the big lie will be seen by Fox News viewers. When we keep talking about these alternative realities and, you know, what Fox News viewers here and what they know, There’s no way to avoid what they’re going to hear next week here in Milwaukee.

That’s what’s so interesting. Is that is that Brett Bear’s gonna force the issue or Martha McCallum. And the candidates, you know, there’s a quorum now. I mean, there are four of them now. We’re gonna speak the truth.

Well, okay, Tim Scott’s gonna try to fudge it. But when pressed, you know, he will say yes. I voted to certify Biden’s election. He’ll say there was a lot of cheating and this and that. But But in between the fact that they’re all gonna be sobbing over the tragic two tier justice system and Hunter Biden, they are going to cut, you know, they’re gonna cut loose.

The big lie. And so this is just gonna be fascinating. And Mike Pence is I think he’s on a mission to sort of, like, just restore his reputation and finish up strong. And I think that what I think that’s what Chris Christie is doing in this race.

I completely agree with. I think the other candidates, I I think, you know, you’re gonna be here a lot of hundred Biden stuff. You’ll hear a lot of stuff the two tiered justice system. But it will be interesting to see whether or not some of the candidates, you know, especially Ron DeSantis is able to make a pivot to say, okay, but this is why we should not renominate Donald Trump. I mean, at some point, they have to craft the argument that, okay.

Hunter Biden is terrible. Gonna I’m gonna check some of the maga boxes. We’re gonna talk about, Joe Biden, but this is why this party cannot run-in twenty twenty four with this man ahead of the ticket. The problem is they need to craft it in a way that is not solely about electability because the hollow man argument because all Donald Trump has to do is is look at the polls, and I’m not sure that Republican primary voters are as obsessed with electability as a rash political party would be. So it’s going to be interesting to see whether they will do that.

I just don’t think that Rhonda Sanders has the political skills, the political flexibility to be able to do that. Again, I think it’s going to be interesting to see everybody will have a different agenda And we know what Chris Christie’s agenda is going to be. I think that’s pretty clear. We’ll see which Mike Pence shows up. The new more interesting Mike Pence or whether he decides this is the moment to back away and become boring again.

And then we’ll find out whether or not we have, Rhonda Sands. Oh, by the way, speaking of Rhonda Sanders, did you read that piece in the Washington Post about all of the people who Bulwark with him in Florida are completely unsurprised that he’s fallen flat on his face.

It’s just terrible because He somehow I actually I actually feel sorry for him. He has no you are right. He has no political skill. He has he’s very sort of dysfunctional in the way that he deals with staff and situation with his wife, and sort of heading up a political team with strategy and hiring and care and feeding and all that. But he had such a smashing success in his reelection victory because of COVID, because he picked up independent and democratic voters, that he believed it was translatable to a national presidential campaign and so did the donors and they threw so much money at him and told him, you have to save us.

You are the only person that moves us past trump. You have to run You can’t wait it out. You’re only forty four. Of course, the best easiest thing for you to do would be to sit it out, but you have to run now. And he was talked into this and he’s a disaster.

I get really feeling sorry for him and I feel guilty about that, but I feel sorry for him.

I do not feel sorry for him because I think basically the problem is that, you know, he’s he he’s an asshole. Is not just performer to asshole. He really is. What I think is extraordinary, if from that reporting, is that it was so obvious to people that actually worked with him, that he would not scale up Why did we not hear that before? Why were so many Republicans and donors?

Why did they project on to him all of their hopes and wishes Why didn’t they know what what is very clear right now, especially because you read that story, and I think Josh Dossy, from the Washington Post, it’s a great story. That it was no secret that he didn’t play well and get along with others that he would do this. And so you look back on this and go, this reporting would have been perhaps more than hopefully a year and a half ago. And maybe the Republican, quote, unquote, establishment, you know, the national review type wouldn’t have thrown all of their enthusiasm his way, imagining he was somebody that he clearly was not. I mean, apparently, all you need to do is pick up the phone.

And call somebody from Florida and say, what’s the deal with this guy? And you would have found out he’s a flaming asshole. I mean, so I guess there’s a question about the journalism, and there’s also a question about the vetting on the part of Republicans and what their standards are. But in any case, We’re obviously gonna be talking about these cases. We didn’t even get to the hundred Biden case again.

That’ll come up again. But a b Soder, thank you so much for coming back on the podcast on eighty consequential and extraordinary day.

Great to be with you, Charlie. Thank you again for not dumping me for a lawyer. It was so much fun.

And generally never want to have lawyers on just so you know. And thank you all for listening to today’s Bulwark podcast. I’m Charlie Sykes. We will be back tomorrow, and we will do this all over again. The Bullbrook podcast is produced by Katie Cooper, and engineered and edited by Jason Brown.

Make a little sports analysis, pop culture, and great interviews. And you’ve got the rich Eisenhower Show podcast.

The Jets are bracing themselves into doing hard knocks this year.

Prazing themselves. Look, coaches wanna control the controllables. They don’t want to have a camera crew in the building. You know, I know that they wanna lie low. This is what happens when you go swing for the fences and get out of Rogers.

Are you kidding me?

The rich Eisenhower Secret Podcast. Wherever you listen.